Football last knee!
You can imagine, dear reader, that in the 100-meter race, the other pre-runner starts and wins, and that is left to the appreciation of the referee!
Another picture: Imagine a basketball match and the ball goes out repeatedly outside the stadium and this results in the loss of 20 seconds of the match and the referee does not care about it!
In football, decisions like this and more happen, and we repeat phrases such as (judgment of the referee, errors of appreciation, not noticed, and others ..).
I write these lines after applying the video technology (VAR) for three seasons, and it does not seem that many are happy with the technology, yes the technology helped reduce a large number of errors, but there are still a large number of catastrophic errors that occur in all periodicals.
There is a fact that cannot be ignored, which is that the football industry is a billion-dollar industry that spends billions of dollars annually and also generates numbers with the same number of zeros.
So why did technology not enter football until late and in a limited fashion?
While we see that other games are less popular and less wealthy enjoying a bigger technological revolution than football, I do not have an answer to this question and I will leave the reader to try to think about it!
The second important question from my point of view is video technology (VAR) sufficient? Are you solved soccer problems? I don't think!
Video technology intervenes in specific cases whose lawmakers claim that they are important cases in the match such as (goal correctness, direct red card, penalty kick) only!
No additional video technology interventions on the referee's decisions!
Football is a beautiful, complex and smart game, and every detail in it is important. The early yellow card that deserves a fierce defender, for example, will change the way it plays throughout the match, fearing a second yellow card and then being sent off! Not to mention that the technology does not interfere with second warnings, even that which requires expelling a player, and this affects the course of any match, a correct error on the outskirts of the penalty area, and the benefiting team has a player who is good at executing free kicks, but the referee did not pay attention to him! Technology does not interfere!
I repeat what I mentioned earlier, every detail is important and has its weight in the richest, most beautiful and most popular game.
Technology has been invested in almost all stadiums in the world. What is required is to make good use of it, in my opinion, to go beyond the limited areas in which I have been confined to more than that as long as the idea is to give everyone his right.
Also, in my opinion, the supreme authority should be the decision of the (VAR) crew, not the arena judge, whose estimation may cause major errors as we have seen many times, as the arena’s judgment is human and this human being may be affected by several factors, including (physical and mental stress, audience voices, player protests, etc. ..) While the expert committee and the expert committee sitting in the VAR room should not have any kind of these pressures, and referring the decision to the experts of the VAR will save a lot of time, the decision will come to judge by the microphone instead of going to a screen and wasting a little time and a lot of enthusiasm.
Like me, many football fans want to see their passion in progress, not backward. They want to see fair and beautiful football in all its details. Football is at the forefront of the stock exchange and with technology alike.
Another picture: Imagine a basketball match and the ball goes out repeatedly outside the stadium and this results in the loss of 20 seconds of the match and the referee does not care about it!
In football, decisions like this and more happen, and we repeat phrases such as (judgment of the referee, errors of appreciation, not noticed, and others ..).
I write these lines after applying the video technology (VAR) for three seasons, and it does not seem that many are happy with the technology, yes the technology helped reduce a large number of errors, but there are still a large number of catastrophic errors that occur in all periodicals.
There is a fact that cannot be ignored, which is that the football industry is a billion-dollar industry that spends billions of dollars annually and also generates numbers with the same number of zeros.
So why did technology not enter football until late and in a limited fashion?
While we see that other games are less popular and less wealthy enjoying a bigger technological revolution than football, I do not have an answer to this question and I will leave the reader to try to think about it!
The second important question from my point of view is video technology (VAR) sufficient? Are you solved soccer problems? I don't think!
Video technology intervenes in specific cases whose lawmakers claim that they are important cases in the match such as (goal correctness, direct red card, penalty kick) only!
No additional video technology interventions on the referee's decisions!
Football is a beautiful, complex and smart game, and every detail in it is important. The early yellow card that deserves a fierce defender, for example, will change the way it plays throughout the match, fearing a second yellow card and then being sent off! Not to mention that the technology does not interfere with second warnings, even that which requires expelling a player, and this affects the course of any match, a correct error on the outskirts of the penalty area, and the benefiting team has a player who is good at executing free kicks, but the referee did not pay attention to him! Technology does not interfere!
I repeat what I mentioned earlier, every detail is important and has its weight in the richest, most beautiful and most popular game.
Technology has been invested in almost all stadiums in the world. What is required is to make good use of it, in my opinion, to go beyond the limited areas in which I have been confined to more than that as long as the idea is to give everyone his right.
Also, in my opinion, the supreme authority should be the decision of the (VAR) crew, not the arena judge, whose estimation may cause major errors as we have seen many times, as the arena’s judgment is human and this human being may be affected by several factors, including (physical and mental stress, audience voices, player protests, etc. ..) While the expert committee and the expert committee sitting in the VAR room should not have any kind of these pressures, and referring the decision to the experts of the VAR will save a lot of time, the decision will come to judge by the microphone instead of going to a screen and wasting a little time and a lot of enthusiasm.
Like me, many football fans want to see their passion in progress, not backward. They want to see fair and beautiful football in all its details. Football is at the forefront of the stock exchange and with technology alike.
Comments
Post a Comment